Title |
Population structure and genetic variation in the endangered Giant Kangaroo Rat (Dipodomys ingens)
|
---|---|
Published in |
Conservation Genetics, August 2005
|
DOI | 10.1007/s10592-005-9005-9 |
Authors |
S. S. Loew, D. F. Williams, K. Ralls, K. Pilgrim, R. C. Fleischer |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 64 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
France | 2 | 3% |
United States | 2 | 3% |
Malaysia | 1 | 2% |
Montenegro | 1 | 2% |
India | 1 | 2% |
South Africa | 1 | 2% |
Peru | 1 | 2% |
Guatemala | 1 | 2% |
Unknown | 54 | 84% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 19 | 30% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 12 | 19% |
Student > Master | 11 | 17% |
Professor > Associate Professor | 5 | 8% |
Other | 4 | 6% |
Other | 5 | 8% |
Unknown | 8 | 13% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 37 | 58% |
Environmental Science | 13 | 20% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 3 | 5% |
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 1 | 2% |
Unknown | 10 | 16% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 April 2017.
All research outputs
#7,524,294
of 22,962,258 outputs
Outputs from Conservation Genetics
#468
of 1,048 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#20,485
of 58,460 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Conservation Genetics
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,962,258 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,048 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.4. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 58,460 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them