↓ Skip to main content

Phylogenetic Framework for Trema (Celtidaceae)

Overview of attention for article published in Plant Systematics and Evolution, August 2004
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
7 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
22 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
45 Mendeley
Title
Phylogenetic Framework for Trema (Celtidaceae)
Published in
Plant Systematics and Evolution, August 2004
DOI 10.1007/s00606-004-0186-3
Authors

C. Yesson, S. J. Russell, T. Parrish, J. W. Dalling, N. C. Garwood

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 45 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 2 4%
United Kingdom 1 2%
Switzerland 1 2%
Netherlands 1 2%
Unknown 40 89%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 9 20%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 16%
Professor 5 11%
Student > Bachelor 3 7%
Student > Master 3 7%
Other 9 20%
Unknown 9 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 27 60%
Environmental Science 4 9%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 4%
Chemistry 2 4%
Neuroscience 1 2%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 9 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 June 2022.
All research outputs
#7,862,539
of 23,839,820 outputs
Outputs from Plant Systematics and Evolution
#146
of 945 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#19,825
of 59,821 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Plant Systematics and Evolution
#1
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,839,820 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 945 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.2. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 59,821 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them