| Title |
Long‐term Evaluation of Genetic Counseling Following False‐Positive Newborn Screen for Cystic Fibrosis
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Genetic Counseling, February 2010
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10897-009-9274-4 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Laura Cavanagh, Cecilia J. Compton, Audrey Tluczek, Roger L. Brown, Philip M. Farrell |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 59 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Portugal | 1 | 2% |
| Brazil | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 57 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 9 | 15% |
| Student > Master | 8 | 14% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 6 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 4 | 7% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 4 | 7% |
| Other | 11 | 19% |
| Unknown | 17 | 29% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 11 | 19% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 8 | 14% |
| Psychology | 6 | 10% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 5 | 8% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 3 | 5% |
| Other | 5 | 8% |
| Unknown | 21 | 36% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 January 2013.
All research outputs
#7,524,294
of 22,962,258 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Genetic Counseling
#506
of 1,159 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#49,215
of 166,168 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Genetic Counseling
#4
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,962,258 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,159 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 166,168 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.