↓ Skip to main content

Association Between Use of Long-Acting Nitrates and Outcomes in Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction

Overview of attention for article published in Circulation: Heart Failure, April 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
15 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
35 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Association Between Use of Long-Acting Nitrates and Outcomes in Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction
Published in
Circulation: Heart Failure, April 2017
DOI 10.1161/circheartfailure.116.003534
Pubmed ID
Authors

Shir Lynn Lim, Lina Benson, Ulf Dahlström, Carolyn S P Lam, Lars H Lund

Abstract

Nitrates may be beneficial in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) by enhancing cGMP signaling and improving hemodynamics, but real-world data on potential efficacy are lacking. We linked the Swedish Heart Failure Registry to national registries with International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision comorbidity diagnoses and demographic and socioeconomic data. In HFpEF, defined as left ventricular ejection fraction ≥40%, we derived propensity scores for nitrate use using 52 baseline variables. The association between nitrate use and all-cause mortality and the composite of all-cause mortality or first heart failure hospitalization was assessed in a cohort matched 2:1 untreated to treated based on age and propensity score. In the overall HFpEF cohort (n=19 047; mean [SD] age, 76 [12] years; 46% women), nitrates were used in 17%, and the crude 1-year survival for treated versus untreated patients was 79% (95% confidence interval [CI], 78%-80%) versus 84% (95% CI, 83%-84%) respectively; hazard ratio was 1.48 (95% CI, 1.40-1.56; P<0.001) during a median 755-day follow-up. Matching yielded 2235 treated versus 4470 untreated patients, with 1-year survival of 80% (95% CI, 78%-82%) versus 79% (95% CI, 78%-81%) and hazard ratio of 1.06 (95% CI, 0.98-1.15; P=0.12). Nitrates were associated with worse composite outcome in the matched HFpEF cohort, with 1-year event-free survival of 62% (95% CI, 60%-64%) versus 65% (95% CI, 63%-66%) and hazard ratio of 1.11 (95% CI, 1.04-1.18; P=0.003). These patterns were reproduced in several consistency analyses. In HFpEF, the use of nitrates was not associated with improvements in all-cause mortality or heart failure hospitalization.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 35 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 35 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 9 26%
Student > Master 5 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 14%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 6%
Student > Bachelor 2 6%
Other 4 11%
Unknown 8 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 14 40%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 3 9%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 6%
Decision Sciences 2 6%
Computer Science 1 3%
Other 1 3%
Unknown 12 34%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 May 2017.
All research outputs
#16,051,091
of 25,382,440 outputs
Outputs from Circulation: Heart Failure
#1,182
of 1,536 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#185,119
of 323,961 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Circulation: Heart Failure
#12
of 18 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,382,440 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,536 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.6. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 323,961 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 18 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.