↓ Skip to main content

Exploring high dimensional data with Butterfly: a novel classification algorithm based on discrete dynamical systems

Overview of attention for article published in Bioinformatics, October 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
5 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
77 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Exploring high dimensional data with Butterfly: a novel classification algorithm based on discrete dynamical systems
Published in
Bioinformatics, October 2013
DOI 10.1093/bioinformatics/btt602
Pubmed ID
Authors

Joseph Geraci, Moyez Dharsee, Paulo Nuin, Alexandria Haslehurst, Madhuri Koti, Harriet E. Feilotter, Ken Evans

Abstract

We introduce a novel method for visualizing high dimensional data via a discrete dynamical system. This method provides a 2D representation of the relationship between subjects according to a set of variables without geometric projections, transformed axes or principal components. The algorithm exploits a memory-type mechanism inherent in a certain class of discrete dynamical systems collectively referred to as the chaos game that are closely related to iterative function systems. The goal of the algorithm was to create a human readable representation of high dimensional patient data that was capable of detecting unrevealed subclusters of patients from within anticipated classifications. This provides a mechanism to further pursue a more personalized exploration of pathology when used with medical data. For clustering and classification protocols, the dynamical system portion of the algorithm is designed to come after some feature selection filter and before some model evaluation (e.g. clustering accuracy) protocol. In the version given here, a univariate features selection step is performed (in practice more complex feature selection methods are used), a discrete dynamical system is driven by this reduced set of variables (which results in a set of 2D cluster models), these models are evaluated for their accuracy (according to a user-defined binary classification) and finally a visual representation of the top classification models are returned. Thus, in addition to the visualization component, this methodology can be used for both supervised and unsupervised machine learning as the top performing models are returned in the protocol we describe here.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 77 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 6 8%
Canada 1 1%
Switzerland 1 1%
Spain 1 1%
Slovenia 1 1%
Unknown 67 87%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 18 23%
Student > Ph. D. Student 13 17%
Student > Master 9 12%
Professor 8 10%
Student > Bachelor 6 8%
Other 13 17%
Unknown 10 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 15 19%
Computer Science 12 16%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 11 14%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 9 12%
Psychology 3 4%
Other 13 17%
Unknown 14 18%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 February 2014.
All research outputs
#14,599,900
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Bioinformatics
#8,581
of 12,808 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#116,465
of 224,366 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Bioinformatics
#130
of 191 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,808 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.0. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 224,366 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 191 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.