| Title |
Sweet Little Lies: Social Context and the Use of Deception in Negotiation
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Business Ethics, February 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10551-013-1645-y |
| Authors |
Mara Olekalns, Carol T. Kulik, Lin Chew |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 100 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 1% |
| United States | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 98 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 21 | 21% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 15 | 15% |
| Student > Master | 12 | 12% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 6 | 6% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 4 | 4% |
| Other | 22 | 22% |
| Unknown | 20 | 20% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Business, Management and Accounting | 31 | 31% |
| Psychology | 26 | 26% |
| Social Sciences | 11 | 11% |
| Unspecified | 2 | 2% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 7 | 7% |
| Unknown | 22 | 22% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 14. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 July 2018.
All research outputs
#2,263,671
of 22,727,570 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Business Ethics
#401
of 2,930 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#24,518
of 283,060 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Business Ethics
#5
of 32 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,727,570 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,930 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 283,060 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 32 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.