↓ Skip to main content

Different clinical characteristics associated with acute bleeding and delayed bleeding after endoscopic submucosal dissection in patients with early gastric cancer

Overview of attention for article published in Surgical Endoscopy, April 2017
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
50 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
15 Mendeley
Title
Different clinical characteristics associated with acute bleeding and delayed bleeding after endoscopic submucosal dissection in patients with early gastric cancer
Published in
Surgical Endoscopy, April 2017
DOI 10.1007/s00464-017-5513-1
Pubmed ID
Authors

Takafumi Yano, Satoshi Tanabe, Kenji Ishido, Mizuto Suzuki, Natsuko Kawanishi, Sakiko Yamane, Akinori Watanabe, Takuya Wada, Mizutomo Azuma, Chikatoshi Katada, Wasaburo Koizumi

Abstract

Few studies have classified risk factors according to the onset time of bleeding after endoscopic submucosal dissection (post-ESD bleeding). We studied 1767 consecutive lesions in patients who underwent ESD for early gastric cancer from December 2006 through June 2016. Patients who had a remnant stomach or who had undergone reconstruction with a gastric tube were excluded. Post-ESD bleeding was classified into acute bleeding (0-5 days after ESD) and delayed bleeding (6 or more days after ESD), and the risk factors for each type of bleeding were compared. Post-ESD bleeding occurred in 150 (8.5%) of 1767 lesions. Bleeding was acute in 129 lesions (7.3%) and delayed in 21 (1.2%). Acute post-ESD bleeding was frequently associated with lesions located in the distal stomach, expanded indications or non-indicated lesions, a specimen diameter of ≥40 mm, and antithrombotic therapy. Delayed post-ESD bleeding was often associated with lesions located in the proximal stomach, hemodialysis, and antithrombotic therapy. Among 334 lesions in patients who received antithrombotic therapy, post-ESD bleeding occurred in 47 lesions (14.1%). Independent risk factors for post-ESD bleeding were a specimen diameter of ≥40 mm and treatment with 2 or more antithrombotic agents. Acute post-ESD bleeding and delayed post-ESD bleeding were associated with different clinical characteristics. Antithrombotic therapy is a risk factor for post-ESD bleeding in both the acute and delayed phases.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 15 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 15 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 3 20%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 20%
Researcher 2 13%
Librarian 1 7%
Lecturer > Senior Lecturer 1 7%
Other 2 13%
Unknown 3 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 7 47%
Psychology 1 7%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 7%
Chemistry 1 7%
Engineering 1 7%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 4 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 April 2017.
All research outputs
#18,540,642
of 22,962,258 outputs
Outputs from Surgical Endoscopy
#4,791
of 6,091 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#235,048
of 308,981 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Surgical Endoscopy
#121
of 153 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,962,258 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,091 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.1. This one is in the 6th percentile – i.e., 6% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 308,981 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 153 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.