| Title |
Non-Pharmacologic Interventions to Improve the Sleep of Hospitalized Patients: A Systematic Review
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of General Internal Medicine, October 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s11606-013-2640-9 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Ruth Tamrat, Minh-Phuong Huynh-Le, Madhav Goyal |
| Abstract |
Despite the known adverse effects of sleep deprivation on recovery from illness, studies have shown that sleep deprivation remains an incompletely addressed problem among acutely ill inpatients. Behavioral interventions are recommended as first-line therapy prior to using pharmacologic therapy due to the side effects of sedative hypnotics. The objective of this systematic review was to identify non-pharmacologic interventions that have been used to improve sleep quality and quantity of non-intensive care unit (ICU) inpatients. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Egypt | 1 | 50% |
| United States | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 50% |
| Members of the public | 1 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 237 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | <1% |
| Unknown | 235 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 35 | 15% |
| Student > Bachelor | 31 | 13% |
| Researcher | 24 | 10% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 12 | 5% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 11 | 5% |
| Other | 44 | 19% |
| Unknown | 80 | 34% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 58 | 24% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 50 | 21% |
| Psychology | 13 | 5% |
| Neuroscience | 8 | 3% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 1% |
| Other | 20 | 8% |
| Unknown | 85 | 36% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 21. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 July 2020.
All research outputs
#1,618,737
of 23,911,072 outputs
Outputs from Journal of General Internal Medicine
#1,285
of 7,806 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#15,207
of 213,523 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of General Internal Medicine
#15
of 78 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,911,072 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,806 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 213,523 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 78 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.