↓ Skip to main content

Advances in optogenetic and chemogenetic methods to study brain circuits in non-human primates

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Neural Transmission, February 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (64th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
66 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
136 Mendeley
Title
Advances in optogenetic and chemogenetic methods to study brain circuits in non-human primates
Published in
Journal of Neural Transmission, February 2017
DOI 10.1007/s00702-017-1697-8
Pubmed ID
Authors

Adriana Galvan, Michael J. Caiola, Daniel L. Albaugh

Abstract

Over the last 10 years, the use of opto- and chemogenetics to modulate neuronal activity in research applications has increased exponentially. Both techniques involve the genetic delivery of artificial proteins (opsins or engineered receptors) that are expressed on a selective population of neurons. The firing of these neurons can then be manipulated using light sources (for opsins) or by systemic administration of exogenous compounds (for chemogenetic receptors). Opto- and chemogenetic tools have enabled many important advances in basal ganglia research in rodent models, yet these techniques have faced a slow progress in non-human primate (NHP) research. In this review, we present a summary of the current state of these techniques in NHP research and outline some of the main challenges associated with the use of these genetic-based approaches in monkeys. We also explore cutting-edge developments that will facilitate the use of opto- and chemogenetics in NHPs, and help advance our understanding of basal ganglia circuits in normal and pathological conditions.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 136 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 1%
China 1 <1%
Unknown 133 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 31 23%
Researcher 23 17%
Student > Master 22 16%
Student > Bachelor 16 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 4%
Other 13 10%
Unknown 25 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Neuroscience 44 32%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 18 13%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 15 11%
Medicine and Dentistry 10 7%
Psychology 6 4%
Other 15 11%
Unknown 28 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 July 2023.
All research outputs
#7,246,885
of 25,121,016 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Neural Transmission
#642
of 1,916 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#109,083
of 317,784 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Neural Transmission
#21
of 35 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,121,016 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,916 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 317,784 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 35 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.