↓ Skip to main content

Detection of Tuberculosis in HIV-Infected and -Uninfected African Adults Using Whole Blood RNA Expression Signatures: A Case-Control Study

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS Medicine, October 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (66th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
4 news outlets
policy
1 policy source
twitter
16 X users
patent
5 patents

Citations

dimensions_citation
305 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
301 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Detection of Tuberculosis in HIV-Infected and -Uninfected African Adults Using Whole Blood RNA Expression Signatures: A Case-Control Study
Published in
PLOS Medicine, October 2013
DOI 10.1371/journal.pmed.1001538
Pubmed ID
Authors

Myrsini Kaforou, Victoria J. Wright, Tolu Oni, Neil French, Suzanne T. Anderson, Nonzwakazi Bangani, Claire M. Banwell, Andrew J. Brent, Amelia C. Crampin, Hazel M. Dockrell, Brian Eley, Robert S. Heyderman, Martin L. Hibberd, Florian Kern, Paul R. Langford, Ling Ling, Marc Mendelson, Tom H. Ottenhoff, Femia Zgambo, Robert J. Wilkinson, Lachlan J. Coin, Michael Levin

Abstract

A major impediment to tuberculosis control in Africa is the difficulty in diagnosing active tuberculosis (TB), particularly in the context of HIV infection. We hypothesized that a unique host blood RNA transcriptional signature would distinguish TB from other diseases (OD) in HIV-infected and -uninfected patients, and that this could be the basis of a simple diagnostic test.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 16 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 301 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 <1%
United States 2 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Kenya 1 <1%
Unknown 294 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 75 25%
Student > Ph. D. Student 48 16%
Student > Master 37 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 18 6%
Student > Bachelor 14 5%
Other 50 17%
Unknown 59 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 69 23%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 59 20%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 40 13%
Immunology and Microbiology 36 12%
Nursing and Health Professions 7 2%
Other 23 8%
Unknown 67 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 51. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 December 2023.
All research outputs
#830,357
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from PLOS Medicine
#1,292
of 5,161 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#7,356
of 224,748 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS Medicine
#18
of 56 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,161 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 77.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 224,748 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 56 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.