| Title |
Detrimental effects of noise on anaesthetists
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Canadian Journal of Anesthesia/Journal canadien d'anesthésie, July 1995
|
| DOI | 10.1007/bf03011878 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
V. S. S. N. Murthy, S. K. Malhotra, I. Bala, M. Raghunathan |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 60 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 3% |
| Canada | 2 | 3% |
| Australia | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 55 | 92% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 14 | 23% |
| Researcher | 10 | 17% |
| Student > Master | 9 | 15% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 7 | 12% |
| Other | 6 | 10% |
| Other | 7 | 12% |
| Unknown | 7 | 12% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 22 | 37% |
| Psychology | 8 | 13% |
| Engineering | 7 | 12% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 4 | 7% |
| Design | 4 | 7% |
| Other | 6 | 10% |
| Unknown | 9 | 15% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 April 2013.
All research outputs
#8,882,501
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Canadian Journal of Anesthesia/Journal canadien d'anesthésie
#1,420
of 2,918 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#7,482
of 23,289 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Canadian Journal of Anesthesia/Journal canadien d'anesthésie
#2
of 13 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,918 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.6. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 23,289 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 13 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.