↓ Skip to main content

Resistance training is linked to heightened positive motivational state and lower negative affect among healthy women aged 65–70

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Women & Aging, April 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (78th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (52nd percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
17 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
106 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Resistance training is linked to heightened positive motivational state and lower negative affect among healthy women aged 65–70
Published in
Journal of Women & Aging, April 2017
DOI 10.1080/08952841.2017.1301720
Pubmed ID
Authors

Helena Ericson, Therése Skoog, Mattias Johansson, Britta Wåhlin-Larsson

Abstract

Resistance training (RT) improves overall health, but the psychological effects of RT in healthy old adults have not been tested. The aim of this study was to investigate a sample of 65-70-year-old healthy and physically active women to assess their sense of coherence, health-related quality of life, hope, and affect, before and after taking part in a 24-week RT intervention (N = 14), compared to controls (N = 18). Findings showed a significant increase in hope (p = 0.013) and a significant decrease in negative affect (p = 0.002). Starting RT after age 65 does not appear to negatively impact on women's psychological health but seems to be associated with important psychological health benefits.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 106 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 106 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 17 16%
Student > Master 13 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 7%
Student > Postgraduate 6 6%
Other 5 5%
Other 20 19%
Unknown 38 36%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Sports and Recreations 16 15%
Medicine and Dentistry 14 13%
Nursing and Health Professions 13 12%
Psychology 7 7%
Social Sciences 3 3%
Other 10 9%
Unknown 43 41%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 February 2022.
All research outputs
#4,169,998
of 25,382,440 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Women & Aging
#55
of 323 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#69,094
of 323,891 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Women & Aging
#7
of 17 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,382,440 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 323 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 323,891 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 17 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its contemporaries.