| Title |
Policy and systems of flood risk management: a comparative study between Japan and Spain
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Natural Hazards, March 2017
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s11069-017-2802-x |
| Authors |
Isao Nakamura, Maria Carmen Llasat |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 2 | 67% |
| Germany | 1 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 97 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 96 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 20 | 21% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 14 | 14% |
| Researcher | 9 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 7 | 7% |
| Lecturer | 5 | 5% |
| Other | 11 | 11% |
| Unknown | 31 | 32% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Engineering | 12 | 12% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 10 | 10% |
| Environmental Science | 10 | 10% |
| Social Sciences | 8 | 8% |
| Computer Science | 5 | 5% |
| Other | 13 | 13% |
| Unknown | 39 | 40% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 June 2017.
All research outputs
#2,462,127
of 22,962,258 outputs
Outputs from Natural Hazards
#228
of 1,830 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#48,766
of 309,402 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Natural Hazards
#4
of 41 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,962,258 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,830 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 309,402 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 41 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.