↓ Skip to main content

Initial results of carotid artery stenting in Japan

Overview of attention for article published in Cardiovascular Intervention and Therapeutics, September 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#46 of 126)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
8 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
20 Mendeley
Title
Initial results of carotid artery stenting in Japan
Published in
Cardiovascular Intervention and Therapeutics, September 2012
DOI 10.1007/s12928-012-0134-z
Pubmed ID
Authors

Yuji Ikari, Kazuo Misumi, Hiroyoshi Yokoi, Nobuhiko Ogata, Tomoyuki Umemoto, Michitaka Uesugi, Yoshihisa Kinoshita, Masatsugu Nakano, Michiaki Higashitani, Hideki Abe, Hiroshi Ando, Keizou Yamamoto, Shuzou Tanimoto

Abstract

Carotid artery stenting (CAS) was approved by the government and reimbursement was started in 2008 in Japan, probably the last country in the world. CASCARD is a retrospective registry study performed by cardiologists to assess initial results of CAS in Japan. CAS was indicated for patients with at least one high risk factor for carotid endarterectomy and with >50 % stenosis in symptomatic or >80 % stenosis in asymptomatic patients. Primary endpoint was major adverse events (MAE) including death, myocardial infarction and any stroke at 30 days. Between April 2008 and March 2010, a total of 704 cases were enrolled from 55 centers. The study population with an average age of 74 ± 8 years included 62 % asymptomatic patients, with 23 % of cases with contralateral carotid artery occlusion or significant stenoses. Angioguard filter wire was exclusively used as a primary protection device and successfully passed the lesion in 701 cases (99.6 %). Precise stent was implanted successfully in all cases. MAE at 30 days was 3.7:0.3 % death, 0 % myocardial infarction, and 3.4 % stroke (0.4 % major ipsilateral stroke). Death or any stroke rate at 30 days was 2.7 % in asymptomatic and 5.5 % in symptomatic patients. The CASCARD study showed that the initial results of CAS in Japan are acceptable for both symptomatic and asymptomatic cases.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 20 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 20 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 4 20%
Researcher 3 15%
Student > Master 3 15%
Student > Postgraduate 2 10%
Student > Bachelor 2 10%
Other 4 20%
Unknown 2 10%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 11 55%
Sports and Recreations 1 5%
Unknown 8 40%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 October 2013.
All research outputs
#15,283,138
of 22,727,570 outputs
Outputs from Cardiovascular Intervention and Therapeutics
#46
of 126 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#107,867
of 171,792 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cardiovascular Intervention and Therapeutics
#2
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,727,570 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 126 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 1.9. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 171,792 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.