↓ Skip to main content

Pathogens, Nutritional Deficiency, and Climate Influences on a Declining Moose Population

Overview of attention for article published in Wildlife Monographs, December 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (95th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (88th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
2 news outlets
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
145 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
217 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Pathogens, Nutritional Deficiency, and Climate Influences on a Declining Moose Population
Published in
Wildlife Monographs, December 2010
DOI 10.2193/0084-0173(2006)166[1:pndaci]2.0.co;2
Authors

DENNIS L. MURRAY, ERIC W. COX, WARREN B. BALLARD, HEATHER A. WHITLAW, MARK S. LENARZ, THOMAS W. CUSTER, TERRI BARNETT, TODD K. FULLER

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 217 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Canada 4 2%
United States 4 2%
Brazil 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Czechia 1 <1%
Unknown 204 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 42 19%
Student > Ph. D. Student 38 18%
Student > Master 33 15%
Student > Bachelor 30 14%
Professor > Associate Professor 8 4%
Other 26 12%
Unknown 40 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 106 49%
Environmental Science 33 15%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 12 6%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 2%
Medicine and Dentistry 5 2%
Other 13 6%
Unknown 43 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 23. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 November 2013.
All research outputs
#1,608,435
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Wildlife Monographs
#10
of 47 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#8,125
of 191,085 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Wildlife Monographs
#1
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 47 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.9. This one scored the same or higher as 37 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 191,085 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them