You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
A non-invasive approach to determining pine marten abundance and predation
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
European Journal of Wildlife Research, October 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10344-013-0771-2 |
| Authors |
Emma Sheehy, Denise B. O’Meara, Catherine O’Reilly, Anthony Smart, Colin Lawton |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 16 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 5 | 31% |
| Ireland | 4 | 25% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 6% |
| Unknown | 6 | 38% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 14 | 88% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 13% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 150 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| New Zealand | 1 | <1% |
| Switzerland | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 148 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 33 | 22% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 24 | 16% |
| Researcher | 21 | 14% |
| Student > Master | 20 | 13% |
| Other | 9 | 6% |
| Other | 19 | 13% |
| Unknown | 24 | 16% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 63 | 42% |
| Environmental Science | 25 | 17% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 9 | 6% |
| Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 5 | 3% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 5 | 3% |
| Other | 10 | 7% |
| Unknown | 33 | 22% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 39. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 August 2015.
All research outputs
#1,058,835
of 25,399,318 outputs
Outputs from European Journal of Wildlife Research
#44
of 1,075 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#9,553
of 224,722 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Journal of Wildlife Research
#1
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,399,318 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,075 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 224,722 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them