↓ Skip to main content

Novel evidence in support of the bilingual advantage: Influences of task demands and experience on cognitive control and working memory

Overview of attention for article published in Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, October 2013
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
8 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
77 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
170 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Novel evidence in support of the bilingual advantage: Influences of task demands and experience on cognitive control and working memory
Published in
Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, October 2013
DOI 10.3758/s13423-013-0524-y
Pubmed ID
Authors

Brooke N. Macnamara, Andrew R. A. Conway

Abstract

The bilingual advantage-enhanced cognitive control relative to monolinguals-possibly occurs due to experience engaging general cognitive mechanisms in order to manage two languages. Supporting this hypothesis is evidence that bimodal (signed language-spoken language) bilinguals do not demonstrate such an advantage, presumably because the distinct language modalities reduce conflict and control demands. We hypothesized that the mechanism responsible for the bilingual advantage is the interplay between (a) the magnitude of bilingual management demands and (b) the amount of experience managing those demands. We recruited adult bimodal bilinguals with high bilingual management demands and examined cognitive control and working memory capacity longitudinally. After gaining experience managing high bilingual management demands, participants outperformed themselves from 2 years earlier on cognitive abilities associated with managing the bilingual demands. These results suggest that cognitive control outcomes for bilinguals vary as a function of the mechanisms recruited during bilingual management and the amount of experience managing the bilingual demands.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 170 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 5 3%
Turkey 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Belgium 1 <1%
Unknown 160 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 38 22%
Student > Bachelor 31 18%
Student > Master 23 14%
Researcher 13 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 9 5%
Other 28 16%
Unknown 28 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 88 52%
Linguistics 26 15%
Social Sciences 10 6%
Arts and Humanities 3 2%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 1%
Other 8 5%
Unknown 33 19%