↓ Skip to main content

Impact of a population-based HPV vaccination program on cervical abnormalities: a data linkage study

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Medicine, October 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (82nd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
3 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
policy
1 policy source
twitter
58 X users
facebook
4 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
238 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
192 Mendeley
Title
Impact of a population-based HPV vaccination program on cervical abnormalities: a data linkage study
Published in
BMC Medicine, October 2013
DOI 10.1186/1741-7015-11-227
Pubmed ID
Authors

Dorota M Gertig, Julia ML Brotherton, Alison C Budd, Kelly Drennan, Genevieve Chappell, A Marion Saville

Abstract

Australia was one of the first countries to introduce a publicly funded national human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccination program that commenced in April 2007, using the quadrivalent HPV vaccine targeting 12- to 13-year-old girls on an ongoing basis. Two-year catch-up programs were offered to 14- to 17- year-old girls in schools and 18- to 26-year-old women in community-based settings. We present data from the school-based program on population-level vaccine effectiveness against cervical abnormalities in Victoria, Australia.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 58 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 192 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 2 1%
Japan 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 188 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 36 19%
Student > Bachelor 23 12%
Researcher 20 10%
Other 18 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 18 9%
Other 35 18%
Unknown 42 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 66 34%
Nursing and Health Professions 18 9%
Social Sciences 16 8%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 8 4%
Immunology and Microbiology 7 4%
Other 26 14%
Unknown 51 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 71. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 May 2023.
All research outputs
#610,586
of 25,602,335 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medicine
#446
of 4,060 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#5,068
of 225,233 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medicine
#11
of 58 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,602,335 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,060 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 45.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 225,233 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 58 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.