| Title |
“The river is us; the river is in our veins”: re-defining river restoration in three Indigenous communities
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Sustainability Science, February 2017
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s11625-016-0421-1 |
| Authors |
Coleen A. Fox, Nicholas James Reo, Dale A. Turner, JoAnne Cook, Frank Dituri, Brett Fessell, James Jenkins, Aimee Johnson, Terina M. Rakena, Chris Riley, Ashleigh Turner, Julian Williams, Mark Wilson |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Colombia | 1 | 11% |
| Canada | 1 | 11% |
| Australia | 1 | 11% |
| United States | 1 | 11% |
| Unknown | 5 | 56% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 5 | 56% |
| Scientists | 4 | 44% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 221 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 221 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 38 | 17% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 37 | 17% |
| Student > Bachelor | 20 | 9% |
| Researcher | 19 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 16 | 7% |
| Other | 33 | 15% |
| Unknown | 58 | 26% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Environmental Science | 60 | 27% |
| Social Sciences | 35 | 16% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 15 | 7% |
| Arts and Humanities | 10 | 5% |
| Engineering | 8 | 4% |
| Other | 27 | 12% |
| Unknown | 66 | 30% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 34. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 October 2021.
All research outputs
#1,209,561
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Sustainability Science
#92
of 959 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#24,061
of 327,572 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Sustainability Science
#2
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 959 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 327,572 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 6 of them.