You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
An exploratory study to evaluate whether medical nutrition therapy can improve dietary intake in hospital patients who eat poorly
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Human Nutrition & Dietetics, October 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1111/jhn.12173 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
E. Agarwal, M. Ferguson, M. Banks, J. Bauer, S. Capra, E. Isenring |
| Abstract |
The Australasian Nutrition Care Day Survey (ANCDS) reported that two-fifths of patients consume ≤50% of the offered food in Australian and New Zealand hospitals. After controlling for confounders (nutritional status, age, disease type and severity), the ANCDS also established an independent association between poor food intake and increased in-hospital mortality. The present study aimed to evaluate whether medical nutrition therapy (MNT) could improve dietary intake in hospital patients eating poorly. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 25% |
| Unknown | 3 | 75% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 50% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 42 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Australia | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 41 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 8 | 19% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 6 | 14% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 5 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 5 | 12% |
| Other | 4 | 10% |
| Other | 10 | 24% |
| Unknown | 4 | 10% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 13 | 31% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 11 | 26% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 5% |
| Computer Science | 2 | 5% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 4 | 10% |
| Unknown | 9 | 21% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 October 2013.
All research outputs
#15,890,477
of 25,604,262 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Human Nutrition & Dietetics
#1,141
of 1,567 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#127,125
of 225,221 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Human Nutrition & Dietetics
#24
of 34 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,604,262 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,567 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 17.4. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 225,221 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 34 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.