↓ Skip to main content

Linking the EU emissions trading scheme: economic implications of allowance allocation and global carbon constraints

Overview of attention for article published in Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, May 2009
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
21 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
36 Mendeley
Title
Linking the EU emissions trading scheme: economic implications of allowance allocation and global carbon constraints
Published in
Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, May 2009
DOI 10.1007/s11027-009-9180-y
Authors

N. Anger, B. Brouns, J. Onigkeit

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 36 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 3%
Unknown 35 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 7 19%
Student > Bachelor 6 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 11%
Professor > Associate Professor 4 11%
Student > Master 4 11%
Other 8 22%
Unknown 3 8%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 11 31%
Environmental Science 7 19%
Social Sciences 7 19%
Engineering 4 11%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 6%
Other 1 3%
Unknown 4 11%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 July 2012.
All research outputs
#7,942,395
of 23,906,448 outputs
Outputs from Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change
#457
of 688 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#39,007
of 113,429 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change
#1
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,906,448 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 688 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.8. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 113,429 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them