↓ Skip to main content

Scalp EEG is not a Blur: It Can See High Frequency Oscillations Although Their Generators are Small

Overview of attention for article published in Brain Topography, October 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (82nd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (87th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
11 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
135 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
180 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Scalp EEG is not a Blur: It Can See High Frequency Oscillations Although Their Generators are Small
Published in
Brain Topography, October 2013
DOI 10.1007/s10548-013-0321-y
Pubmed ID
Authors

R. Zelmann, J. M. Lina, A. Schulze-Bonhage, J. Gotman, J. Jacobs

Abstract

High frequency oscillations (HFOs) are emerging as biomarkers of epileptogenicity. They have been shown to originate from small brain regions. Surprisingly, spontaneous HFOs can be recorded from the scalp. To understand how is it possible to observe these small events on the scalp, one avenue is the analysis of the cortical correlates at the time of scalp HFOs. Using simultaneous scalp and intracranial recordings of 11 patients, we studied the spatial distribution of scalp events on the cortical surface. For typical interictal epileptiform discharges the subdural distributions were, as expected, spatially extended. On the contrary, for scalp HFOs the subdural maps corresponded to focal sources, consisting of one or a few small spatial extent activations. These topographies suggest that small cortical areas generated the HFOs seen on the scalp. Similar scalp distributions corresponded to distinct distributions on a standard 1 cm subdural grid and averaging similar scalp HFOs resulted in focal subdural maps. The assumption that a subdural grid "sees" everything that contributes to the potential of nearby scalp contacts was not valid for HFOs. The results suggest that these small extent events are spatially undersampled with standard scalp and grid inter-electrode distances. High-density scalp electrode distributions seem necessary to obtain a solid sampling of HFOs on the scalp. A better understanding of the influence of spatial sampling on the observation of high frequency brain activity on the scalp is important for their clinical use as biomarkers of epilepsy.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 180 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Belgium 1 <1%
Peru 1 <1%
Unknown 171 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 33 18%
Researcher 33 18%
Student > Master 26 14%
Student > Doctoral Student 10 6%
Professor > Associate Professor 10 6%
Other 33 18%
Unknown 35 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 36 20%
Neuroscience 33 18%
Engineering 29 16%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 11 6%
Computer Science 7 4%
Other 21 12%
Unknown 43 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 June 2022.
All research outputs
#4,447,861
of 25,122,155 outputs
Outputs from Brain Topography
#64
of 515 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#38,441
of 219,008 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Brain Topography
#3
of 16 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,122,155 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 82nd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 515 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 219,008 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 16 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.