↓ Skip to main content

STED microscopy visualizes energy deposition of single ions in a solid-state detector beyond diffraction limit

Overview of attention for article published in Physics in Medicine & Biology, April 2017
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
23 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
STED microscopy visualizes energy deposition of single ions in a solid-state detector beyond diffraction limit
Published in
Physics in Medicine & Biology, April 2017
DOI 10.1088/1361-6560/aa5edc
Pubmed ID
Authors

M Niklas, M Henrich, O Jäkel, J Engelhardt, A Abdollahi, S Greilich

Abstract

Fluorescent nuclear track detectors (FNTDs) allow for visualization of single-particle traversal in clinical ion beams. The point spread function of the confocal readout has so far hindered a more detailed characterization of the track spots-the ion's characteristic signature left in the FNTD. Here we report on the readout of the FNTD by optical nanoscopy, namely stimulated emission depletion microscopy. It was firstly possible to visualize the track spots of carbon ions and protons beyond the diffraction limit of conventional light microscopy with a resolving power of approximately 80 nm (confocal: 320 nm). A clear discrimination of the spatial width, defined by the full width half maximum of track spots from particles (proton and carbon ions), with a linear energy transfer (LET) ranging from approximately 2-1016 keV µm(-1) was possible. Results suggest that the width depends on LET but not on particle charge within the uncertainties. A discrimination of particle type by width thus does not seem possible (as well as with confocal microscopy). The increased resolution, however, could allow for refined determination of the cross-sectional area facing substantial energy deposition. This work could pave the way towards development of optical nanoscopy-based analysis of radiation-induced cellular response using cell-fluorescent ion track hybrid detectors.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 23 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 23 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 26%
Researcher 5 22%
Student > Master 3 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 9%
Professor 1 4%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 6 26%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Physics and Astronomy 6 26%
Business, Management and Accounting 2 9%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 9%
Chemistry 2 9%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 4%
Other 2 9%
Unknown 8 35%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 April 2017.
All research outputs
#24,648,931
of 27,387,710 outputs
Outputs from Physics in Medicine & Biology
#5,279
of 6,285 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#291,389
of 330,470 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Physics in Medicine & Biology
#66
of 79 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 27,387,710 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,285 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.9. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 330,470 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 79 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.