↓ Skip to main content

The current state of intermittent intraoperative neural monitoring for prevention of recurrent laryngeal nerve injury during thyroidectomy: a PRISMA-compliant systematic review of overlapping meta-anal…

Overview of attention for article published in Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery, April 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
52 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
72 Mendeley
Title
The current state of intermittent intraoperative neural monitoring for prevention of recurrent laryngeal nerve injury during thyroidectomy: a PRISMA-compliant systematic review of overlapping meta-analyses
Published in
Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery, April 2017
DOI 10.1007/s00423-017-1580-y
Pubmed ID
Authors

Brandon Michael Henry, Matthew J. Graves, Jens Vikse, Beatrice Sanna, Przemysław A. Pękala, Jerzy A. Walocha, Marcin Barczyński, Krzysztof A. Tomaszewski

Abstract

Recurrent laryngeal nerve (RLN) injury is one of the most common and detrimental complications following thyroidectomy. Intermittent intraoperative nerve monitoring (I-IONM) has been proposed to reduce prevalence of RLN injury following thyroidectomy and has gained increasing acceptance in recent years. A comprehensive database search was performed, and data from eligible meta-analyses meeting the inclusion criteria were extracted. Transient, permanent, and overall RLN injuries were the primary outcome measures. Quality assessment via AMSTAR, heterogeneity appraisal, and selection of best evidence was performed via a Jadad algorithm. Eight meta-analyses met the inclusion criteria. Meta-analyses included between 6 and 23 original studies each. Via utilization of the Jadad algorithm, the selection of best evidence resulted in choosing of Pisanu et al. (Surg Res 188:152-161, 2014). Five out of eight meta-analyses demonstrated non-significant (p > 0.05) RLN injury reduction with the use of I-IONM versus nerve visualization alone. To date, I-IONM has not achieved a significant level of RLN injury reduction as shown by the meta-analysis conducted by Pisanu et al. (Surg Res 188:152-161, 2014). However, most recent developments of IONM technology including continuous vagal IONM and concept of staged thyroidectomy in case of loss of signal on the first side in order to prevent bilateral RLN injury may provide additional benefits which were out of the scope of this study and need to be assessed in further prospective multicenter trials.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 72 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 72 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 9 13%
Student > Master 6 8%
Other 5 7%
Student > Bachelor 5 7%
Student > Postgraduate 5 7%
Other 18 25%
Unknown 24 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 29 40%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 3%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 3%
Engineering 2 3%
Computer Science 1 1%
Other 10 14%
Unknown 26 36%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 January 2018.
All research outputs
#14,339,760
of 22,962,258 outputs
Outputs from Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery
#543
of 1,140 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#173,226
of 308,981 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery
#5
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,962,258 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,140 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.5. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 308,981 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 4 of them.