↓ Skip to main content

Neural Underpinnings of the Identifiable Victim Effect: Affect Shifts Preferences for Giving

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Neuroscience, October 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (97th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
9 news outlets
blogs
3 blogs
twitter
12 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
128 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
240 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Neural Underpinnings of the Identifiable Victim Effect: Affect Shifts Preferences for Giving
Published in
Journal of Neuroscience, October 2013
DOI 10.1523/jneurosci.2348-13.2013
Pubmed ID
Authors

Alexander Genevsky, Daniel Västfjäll, Paul Slovic, Brian Knutson

Abstract

The "identifiable victim effect" refers to peoples' tendency to preferentially give to identified versus anonymous victims of misfortune, and has been proposed to partly depend on affect. By soliciting charitable donations from human subjects during behavioral and neural (i.e., functional magnetic resonance imaging) experiments, we sought to determine whether and how affect might promote the identifiable victim effect. Behaviorally, subjects gave more to orphans depicted by photographs versus silhouettes, and their shift in preferences was mediated by photograph-induced feelings of positive arousal, but not negative arousal. Neurally, while photographs versus silhouettes elicited activity in widespread circuits associated with facial and affective processing, only nucleus accumbens activity predicted and could statistically account for increased donations. Together, these findings suggest that presenting evaluable identifiable information can recruit positive arousal, which then promotes giving. We propose that affect elicited by identifiable stimuli can compel people to give more to strangers, even despite costs to the self.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 12 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 240 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 5 2%
Germany 1 <1%
China 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
Bosnia and Herzegovina 1 <1%
Unknown 230 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 59 25%
Student > Master 39 16%
Researcher 32 13%
Student > Bachelor 25 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 16 7%
Other 37 15%
Unknown 32 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 108 45%
Business, Management and Accounting 17 7%
Neuroscience 15 6%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 13 5%
Social Sciences 12 5%
Other 34 14%
Unknown 41 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 113. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 December 2021.
All research outputs
#374,970
of 25,550,333 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Neuroscience
#482
of 24,193 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,875
of 225,128 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Neuroscience
#11
of 336 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,550,333 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 24,193 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 225,128 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 336 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.