| Title |
Diffuse osteosclerosis in a patient with prostate cancer
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Osteoporosis International, October 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00198-013-2545-9 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
N. Üstün, I. Üstün, T. Özgür, N. Atci, F. Aydoğan, A. T. Sümbül, A. D. Turhanoğlu |
| Abstract |
A 61-year-old man was referred to our outpatient clinic because of severe bilateral upper leg pain for 1 year. On admission, the patient had anemia and a high serum alkaline phosphatase level. Lumbar and femoral neck T-scores were +10.5 and +9.6, respectively. His radius 33 % T-score was -2.8. Plain radiographs of the patient's pelvis, spine, and long bones revealed osteosclerosis. The patient had previously undergone a prostate biopsy, which showed prostate adenocarcinoma (Gleason score 3 + 4). The patient's total and free prostate-specific antigen were very high. According to previous records, the patient did not have anemia, and his serum alkaline phosphatase (ALP) level was normal. An abdominal radiograph taken 2 years earlier revealed a normal spine and pelvic bone. Bone scintigraphy yielded nontypical findings for prostate cancer metastasis. Computed tomography of the patient's thorax and abdomen showed heterogeneous sclerotic areas in all bones consistent with prostate cancer metastasis. A bone marrow biopsy disclosed disseminated carcinomatosis of bone marrow in association with prostate cancer. Clinicians should be aware of the possibility of prostate malignancy as a cause of high bone mineral density (BMD), even in the absence of typical localized findings on plain radiographs. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Netherlands | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 7 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Italy | 1 | 14% |
| Unknown | 6 | 86% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 3 | 43% |
| Researcher | 1 | 14% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 1 | 14% |
| Unknown | 2 | 29% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 3 | 43% |
| Social Sciences | 1 | 14% |
| Computer Science | 1 | 14% |
| Unknown | 2 | 29% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 October 2013.
All research outputs
#20,207,295
of 22,727,570 outputs
Outputs from Osteoporosis International
#2,960
of 3,602 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#184,982
of 211,746 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Osteoporosis International
#30
of 41 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,727,570 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,602 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.6. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 211,746 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 41 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.