| Title |
Human dose response relation for airborne exposure to Coxiella burnetii
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Infectious Diseases, October 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1471-2334-13-488 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Russell John Brooke, Mirjam EE Kretzschmar, Nico T Mutters, Peter F Teunis |
| Abstract |
The recent outbreak of Q fever in the Netherlands between 2007 and 2009 is the largest recorded Q fever outbreak. Exposure to Coxiella burnetii may cause Q fever but the size of the population exposed during the outbreak remained uncertain as little is known of the infectivity of this pathogen. The quantification of the infectiousness and the corresponding response is necessary for assessing the risk to the population. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 3 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 67% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 76 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Portugal | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 75 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 15 | 20% |
| Student > Master | 14 | 18% |
| Researcher | 10 | 13% |
| Professor | 7 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 4 | 5% |
| Other | 8 | 11% |
| Unknown | 18 | 24% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 14 | 18% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 11 | 14% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 7 | 9% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 6 | 8% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 5 | 7% |
| Other | 10 | 13% |
| Unknown | 23 | 30% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 October 2022.
All research outputs
#7,341,260
of 25,750,437 outputs
Outputs from BMC Infectious Diseases
#2,430
of 8,695 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#62,871
of 225,306 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Infectious Diseases
#31
of 125 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,750,437 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 71st percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,695 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 225,306 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 125 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.