| Title |
Digital breast tomosynthesis versus digital mammography: a clinical performance study
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
European Radiology, December 2009
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00330-009-1699-5 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Gisella Gennaro, Alicia Toledano, Cosimo di Maggio, Enrica Baldan, Elisabetta Bezzon, Manuela La Grassa, Luigi Pescarini, Ilaria Polico, Alessandro Proietti, Aida Toffoli, Pier Carlo Muzzio |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 205 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Italy | 2 | <1% |
| United States | 2 | <1% |
| Switzerland | 1 | <1% |
| Austria | 1 | <1% |
| France | 1 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 196 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 42 | 20% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 34 | 17% |
| Student > Master | 23 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 17 | 8% |
| Other | 17 | 8% |
| Other | 34 | 17% |
| Unknown | 38 | 19% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 59 | 29% |
| Engineering | 36 | 18% |
| Physics and Astronomy | 29 | 14% |
| Computer Science | 7 | 3% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 6 | 3% |
| Other | 22 | 11% |
| Unknown | 46 | 22% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 October 2019.
All research outputs
#5,611,796
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from European Radiology
#761
of 5,098 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#29,978
of 177,301 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Radiology
#2
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,098 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 177,301 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 6 of them.