Title |
Breast tomosynthesis in clinical practice: initial results
|
---|---|
Published in |
European Radiology, August 2009
|
DOI | 10.1007/s00330-009-1523-2 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Hendrik J. Teertstra, Claudette E. Loo, Maurice A. A. J. van den Bosch, Harm van Tinteren, Emiel J. T. Rutgers, Sara H. Muller, Kenneth G. A. Gilhuijs |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 135 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 2 | 1% |
United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
France | 1 | <1% |
Austria | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 130 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 31 | 23% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 23 | 17% |
Student > Master | 21 | 16% |
Student > Bachelor | 10 | 7% |
Other | 5 | 4% |
Other | 23 | 17% |
Unknown | 22 | 16% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 40 | 30% |
Physics and Astronomy | 25 | 19% |
Engineering | 22 | 16% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 5 | 4% |
Mathematics | 3 | 2% |
Other | 9 | 7% |
Unknown | 31 | 23% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 October 2019.
All research outputs
#4,728,388
of 22,925,760 outputs
Outputs from European Radiology
#617
of 4,141 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#20,357
of 111,320 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Radiology
#3
of 24 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,925,760 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 76th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,141 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 111,320 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 24 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.