↓ Skip to main content

Chronic Hepatitis B Management Based on Standard Guidelines in Community Primary Care and Specialty Clinics

Overview of attention for article published in Digestive Diseases and Sciences, October 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (75th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (78th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog

Citations

dimensions_citation
24 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
33 Mendeley
Title
Chronic Hepatitis B Management Based on Standard Guidelines in Community Primary Care and Specialty Clinics
Published in
Digestive Diseases and Sciences, October 2013
DOI 10.1007/s10620-013-2889-1
Pubmed ID
Authors

Kevin C. Ku, Jiayi Li, Nghi B. Ha, Marina Martin, Vincent G. Nguyen, Mindie H. Nguyen

Abstract

Prior studies have underlined the need for increased screening and awareness of chronic hepatitis B (CHB), especially in certain high-risk populations. However, few studies have examined the patterns of evaluation and management of CHB between primary care physicians (PCP) and specialists according to commonly-used professional guidelines. Our goal was to examine whether necessary laboratory parameters used to determine disease status and eligibility for antiviral therapy were performed by PCPs and specialists.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 33 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 33 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 5 15%
Student > Postgraduate 4 12%
Student > Master 4 12%
Student > Bachelor 3 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 6%
Other 4 12%
Unknown 11 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 12 36%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 6%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 6%
Unspecified 1 3%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 3%
Other 2 6%
Unknown 13 39%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 October 2013.
All research outputs
#6,038,414
of 23,854,458 outputs
Outputs from Digestive Diseases and Sciences
#976
of 4,304 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#52,189
of 214,717 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Digestive Diseases and Sciences
#7
of 37 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,854,458 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,304 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 214,717 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 37 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.