| Title |
Development of 100Mo-containing scintillating bolometers for a high-sensitivity neutrinoless double-beta decay search
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
The European Physical Journal C, November 2017
|
| DOI | 10.1140/epjc/s10052-017-5343-2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
E. Armengaud, C. Augier, A. S. Barabash, J. W. Beeman, T. B. Bekker, F. Bellini, A. Benoît, L. Bergé, T. Bergmann, J. Billard, R. S. Boiko, A. Broniatowski, V. Brudanin, P. Camus, S. Capelli, L. Cardani, N. Casali, A. Cazes, M. Chapellier, F. Charlieux, D. M. Chernyak, M. de Combarieu, N. Coron, F. A. Danevich, I. Dafinei, M. De Jesus, L. Devoyon, S. Di Domizio, L. Dumoulin, K. Eitel, C. Enss, F. Ferroni, A. Fleischmann, N. Foerster, J. Gascon, L. Gastaldo, L. Gironi, A. Giuliani, V. D. Grigorieva, M. Gros, L. Hehn, S. Hervé, V. Humbert, N. V. Ivannikova, I. M. Ivanov, Y. Jin, A. Juillard, M. Kleifges, V. V. Kobychev, S. I. Konovalov, F. Koskas, V. Kozlov, H. Kraus, V. A. Kudryavtsev, M. Laubenstein, H. Le Sueur, M. Loidl, P. Magnier, E. P. Makarov, M. Mancuso, P. de Marcillac, S. Marnieros, C. Marrache-Kikuchi, S. Nagorny, X-F. Navick, M. O. Nikolaichuk, C. Nones, V. Novati, E. Olivieri, L. Pagnanini, P. Pari, L. Pattavina, M. Pavan, B. Paul, Y. Penichot, G. Pessina, G. Piperno, S. Pirro, O. Plantevin, D. V. Poda, E. Queguiner, T. Redon, M. Rodrigues, S. Rozov, C. Rusconi, V. Sanglard, K. Schäffner, S. Scorza, V. N. Shlegel, B. Siebenborn, O. Strazzer, D. Tcherniakhovski, C. Tomei, V. I. Tretyak, V. I. Umatov, L. Vagneron, Ya. V. Vasiliev, M. Velázquez, M. Vignati, M. Weber, E. Yakushev, A. S. Zolotarova |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 43 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 43 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 15 | 35% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 6 | 14% |
| Student > Bachelor | 2 | 5% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 2 | 5% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 2 | 5% |
| Other | 3 | 7% |
| Unknown | 13 | 30% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Physics and Astronomy | 23 | 53% |
| Computer Science | 1 | 2% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 1 | 2% |
| Materials Science | 1 | 2% |
| Engineering | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 16 | 37% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 October 2017.
All research outputs
#23,065,269
of 25,707,225 outputs
Outputs from The European Physical Journal C
#6,948
of 9,132 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#387,248
of 447,733 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The European Physical Journal C
#185
of 218 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,707,225 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 9,132 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.8. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 447,733 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 218 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.