↓ Skip to main content

Biodiversity Risks from Fossil Fuel Extraction

Overview of attention for article published in Science, October 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (87th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
3 news outlets
blogs
2 blogs
twitter
122 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages
wikipedia
4 Wikipedia pages
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
105 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
367 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Biodiversity Risks from Fossil Fuel Extraction
Published in
Science, October 2013
DOI 10.1126/science.1237261
Pubmed ID
Authors

N. Butt, H. L. Beyer, J. R. Bennett, D. Biggs, R. Maggini, M. Mills, A. R. Renwick, L. M. Seabrook, H. P. Possingham

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 122 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 367 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 6 2%
United States 4 1%
Colombia 2 <1%
Germany 2 <1%
Italy 2 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Other 3 <1%
Unknown 344 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 73 20%
Student > Master 61 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 50 14%
Student > Bachelor 33 9%
Other 17 5%
Other 61 17%
Unknown 72 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 104 28%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 96 26%
Engineering 14 4%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 10 3%
Social Sciences 10 3%
Other 51 14%
Unknown 82 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 122. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 October 2022.
All research outputs
#348,248
of 25,736,439 outputs
Outputs from Science
#9,111
of 83,267 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,629
of 225,537 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Science
#112
of 871 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,736,439 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 83,267 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 65.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 225,537 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 871 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.