| Title |
Do the elderly have a voice? Advance care planning discussions with frail and older individuals: a systematic literature review and narrative synthesis
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
British Journal of General Practice, October 2013
|
| DOI | 10.3399/bjgp13x673667 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Tim Sharp, Emily Moran, Isla Kuhn, Stephen Barclay |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 3 | 27% |
| Australia | 2 | 18% |
| New Zealand | 1 | 9% |
| Unknown | 5 | 45% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 6 | 55% |
| Members of the public | 5 | 45% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 301 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Japan | 2 | <1% |
| Australia | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Belgium | 1 | <1% |
| Argentina | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 294 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 48 | 16% |
| Researcher | 43 | 14% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 37 | 12% |
| Other | 30 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 28 | 9% |
| Other | 65 | 22% |
| Unknown | 50 | 17% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 116 | 39% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 52 | 17% |
| Social Sciences | 27 | 9% |
| Psychology | 13 | 4% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 6 | 2% |
| Other | 26 | 9% |
| Unknown | 61 | 20% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 69. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 May 2021.
All research outputs
#631,354
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from British Journal of General Practice
#261
of 4,934 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#5,183
of 223,052 outputs
Outputs of similar age from British Journal of General Practice
#2
of 47 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,934 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 19.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 223,052 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 47 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.