| Title |
Alpha e-taxonomy: responses from the systematics community to the biodiversity crisis
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Kew Bulletin, May 2008
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s12225-008-9014-1 |
| Authors |
S. J. Mayo, R. Allkin, W. Baker, V. Blagoderov, I. Brake, B. Clark, R. Govaerts, C. Godfray, A. Haigh, R. Hand, K. Harman, M. Jackson, N. Kilian, D. W. Kirkup, I. Kitching, S. Knapp, G. P. Lewis, P. Malcolm, E. von Raab-Straube, D. M. Roberts, M. Scoble, D. A. Simpson, C. Smith, V. Smith, S. Villalba, L. Walley, P. Wilkin |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 12 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 8% |
| Germany | 1 | 8% |
| Philippines | 1 | 8% |
| Singapore | 1 | 8% |
| Unknown | 8 | 67% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 10 | 83% |
| Scientists | 1 | 8% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 8% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 182 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Brazil | 11 | 6% |
| United States | 5 | 3% |
| United Kingdom | 4 | 2% |
| South Africa | 2 | 1% |
| Spain | 2 | 1% |
| Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
| Costa Rica | 1 | <1% |
| Peru | 1 | <1% |
| Australia | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 4 | 2% |
| Unknown | 150 | 82% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 48 | 26% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 38 | 21% |
| Student > Master | 17 | 9% |
| Professor | 15 | 8% |
| Student > Bachelor | 13 | 7% |
| Other | 41 | 23% |
| Unknown | 10 | 5% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 135 | 74% |
| Environmental Science | 12 | 7% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 4 | 2% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 4 | 2% |
| Computer Science | 3 | 2% |
| Other | 7 | 4% |
| Unknown | 17 | 9% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 March 2024.
All research outputs
#4,243,164
of 25,998,826 outputs
Outputs from Kew Bulletin
#141
of 1,216 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#15,560
of 101,984 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Kew Bulletin
#2
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,998,826 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,216 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 101,984 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.