↓ Skip to main content

Typification of Pallas’ names in Salix

Overview of attention for article published in Kew Bulletin, September 2008
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
8 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
10 Mendeley
Title
Typification of Pallas’ names in Salix
Published in
Kew Bulletin, September 2008
DOI 10.1007/s12225-008-9015-0
Authors

Irina Belyaeva, Alexander Sennikov

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 10 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Finland 1 10%
Unknown 9 90%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 30%
Librarian 1 10%
Professor 1 10%
Student > Master 1 10%
Professor > Associate Professor 1 10%
Other 1 10%
Unknown 2 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 3 30%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 30%
Arts and Humanities 1 10%
Chemistry 1 10%
Unknown 2 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 July 2009.
All research outputs
#7,524,294
of 22,962,258 outputs
Outputs from Kew Bulletin
#259
of 1,096 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#31,557
of 87,822 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Kew Bulletin
#2
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,962,258 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,096 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.6. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 87,822 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.