↓ Skip to main content

Pre-moult foraging trips and moult locations of Emperor penguins at the Mawson Coast

Overview of attention for article published in Polar Biology, November 2003
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
18 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
40 Mendeley
Title
Pre-moult foraging trips and moult locations of Emperor penguins at the Mawson Coast
Published in
Polar Biology, November 2003
DOI 10.1007/s00300-003-0574-0
Authors

Barbara Wienecke, Roger Kirkwood, Graham Robertson

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 40 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
New Zealand 1 3%
United States 1 3%
Australia 1 3%
Unknown 37 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 23%
Researcher 6 15%
Student > Master 5 13%
Other 4 10%
Student > Bachelor 2 5%
Other 6 15%
Unknown 8 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 26 65%
Environmental Science 5 13%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 3%
Unknown 8 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 December 2015.
All research outputs
#8,534,976
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Polar Biology
#634
of 1,768 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#35,962
of 142,395 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Polar Biology
#2
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,768 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.7. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 142,395 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 7 of them.