↓ Skip to main content

How the Affordable Care Act Will Strengthen the Nation's Primary Care Foundation

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of General Internal Medicine, April 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (93rd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (87th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
2 news outlets

Citations

dimensions_citation
130 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
191 Mendeley
Title
How the Affordable Care Act Will Strengthen the Nation's Primary Care Foundation
Published in
Journal of General Internal Medicine, April 2011
DOI 10.1007/s11606-011-1720-y
Pubmed ID
Authors

Karen Davis, Melinda Abrams, Kristof Stremikis

Abstract

As the country turns toward implementation of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, realizing the potential of reform will require significant transformation of the American system of health care delivery. To that end, the new law seeks to strengthen the nation's primary care foundation through enhanced reimbursement rates for providers and the use of innovative delivery models such as patient-centered medical homes. Evidence suggests that these strategies can return substantial benefits to both patients and providers by increasing access to primary care services, reducing administrative hassles and burdens, and facilitating coordination across the continuum of care. If successfully implemented, the Affordable Care Act has the potential to realign incentives within the health system and create opportunities for providers to be rewarded for delivering high value, patient-centered primary care. Such a transformation could lead to better outcomes for patients, increase job satisfaction among physicians and encourage more sustainable levels of health spending for the nation.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 191 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 7 4%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Unknown 183 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 54 28%
Student > Ph. D. Student 28 15%
Researcher 22 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 22 12%
Student > Bachelor 22 12%
Other 22 12%
Unknown 21 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 53 28%
Social Sciences 38 20%
Nursing and Health Professions 31 16%
Business, Management and Accounting 9 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 4%
Other 26 14%
Unknown 27 14%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 20. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 October 2021.
All research outputs
#1,667,020
of 23,911,072 outputs
Outputs from Journal of General Internal Medicine
#1,313
of 7,806 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#6,945
of 112,705 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of General Internal Medicine
#5
of 39 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,911,072 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,806 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 112,705 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 39 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.