↓ Skip to main content

Association between perceived racism and physiological stress indices in Native Hawaiians

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Behavioral Medicine, March 2011
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
90 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
132 Mendeley
Title
Association between perceived racism and physiological stress indices in Native Hawaiians
Published in
Journal of Behavioral Medicine, March 2011
DOI 10.1007/s10865-011-9330-z
Pubmed ID
Authors

Joseph Keawe‘aimoku Kaholokula, Andrew Grandinetti, Stefan Keller, Andrea H. Nacapoy, Te Kani Kingi, Marjorie K. Mau

Abstract

The association between racism and the physical health of native U.S. populations has yet to be examined despite their high risk for stress-related disorders and a history of discrimination toward them. We examined the correlation between perceived racism and the two physiological stress indices of cortisol level and blood pressure in 146 adult Native Hawaiians. Attributed and felt racism were assessed with a 10-item shortened version of the Oppression Questionnaire. Height, weight, blood pressure, and salivary cortisol samples (AM and PM) were collected and analyzed along with information on Hawaiian ancestry, BMI, age, sex, marital status, education level, general psychological stress, and ethnic identity. The results indicated that Native Hawaiians reporting more attributed racism had significantly (P < .05) lower average cortisol levels than those reporting less attributed racism, after adjusting for socio-demographic, biological, and psychosocial confounders. Native Hawaiians reporting more felt racism had a significantly higher systolic blood pressure than those reporting less, but this association was not significant after adjusting for the aforementioned confounders. Racism appears to be a chronic stressor that can "get under the skin" of Native Hawaiians by affecting their physical health and risk for stress-related diseases, possibly, through mechanisms of cortisol dysregulation.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 132 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 2%
South Africa 1 <1%
Unknown 128 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 28 21%
Student > Master 19 14%
Student > Bachelor 17 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 14 11%
Researcher 13 10%
Other 20 15%
Unknown 21 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 38 29%
Medicine and Dentistry 19 14%
Social Sciences 19 14%
Nursing and Health Professions 10 8%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 5%
Other 9 7%
Unknown 30 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 October 2013.
All research outputs
#12,768,271
of 22,727,570 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Behavioral Medicine
#681
of 1,069 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#79,969
of 109,049 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Behavioral Medicine
#11
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,727,570 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,069 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.7. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 109,049 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.