↓ Skip to main content

Evaluation of Physicochemical and Glycaemic Properties of Commercial Plant-Based Milk Substitutes

Overview of attention for article published in Plant Foods for Human Nutrition, November 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#27 of 747)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (94th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (99th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
5 news outlets
twitter
5 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
3 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
163 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
480 Mendeley
Title
Evaluation of Physicochemical and Glycaemic Properties of Commercial Plant-Based Milk Substitutes
Published in
Plant Foods for Human Nutrition, November 2016
DOI 10.1007/s11130-016-0583-0
Pubmed ID
Authors

Stephanie Jeske, Emanuele Zannini, Elke K. Arendt

Abstract

The market for plant-based dairy-type products is growing as consumers replace bovine milk in their diet, for medical reasons or as a lifestyle choice. A screening of 17 different commercial plant-based milk substitutes based on different cereals, nuts and legumes was performed, including the evaluation of physicochemical and glycaemic properties. Half of the analysed samples had low or no protein contents (<0.5 %). Only samples based on soya showed considerable high protein contents, matching the value of cow's milk (3.7 %). An in-vitro method was used to predict the glycaemic index. In general, the glycaemic index values ranged from 47 for bovine milk to 64 (almond-based) and up to 100 for rice-based samples. Most of the plant-based milk substitutes were highly unstable with separation rates up to 54.39 %/h. This study demonstrated that nutritional and physicochemical properties of plant-based milk substitutes are strongly dependent on the plant source, processing and fortification. Most products showed low nutritional qualities. Therefore, consumer awareness is important when plant-based milk substitutes are used as an alternative to cow's milk in the diet.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 480 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 480 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 74 15%
Student > Master 69 14%
Researcher 47 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 33 7%
Student > Postgraduate 13 3%
Other 52 11%
Unknown 192 40%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 101 21%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 30 6%
Engineering 27 6%
Nursing and Health Professions 22 5%
Chemistry 20 4%
Other 59 12%
Unknown 221 46%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 50. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 March 2024.
All research outputs
#843,840
of 25,513,063 outputs
Outputs from Plant Foods for Human Nutrition
#27
of 747 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#15,936
of 317,862 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Plant Foods for Human Nutrition
#1
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,513,063 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 747 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 317,862 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them