↓ Skip to main content

Bone mineral status in paraplegic patients who do or do not perform standing

Overview of attention for article published in Osteoporosis International, May 1994
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
98 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
64 Mendeley
Title
Bone mineral status in paraplegic patients who do or do not perform standing
Published in
Osteoporosis International, May 1994
DOI 10.1007/bf01623058
Pubmed ID
Authors

S. Goemaere, M. Van Laere, P. De Neve, J. M. Kaufman

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 64 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Canada 2 3%
Unknown 62 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 14 22%
Student > Master 9 14%
Other 7 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 9%
Student > Bachelor 3 5%
Other 9 14%
Unknown 16 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Engineering 13 20%
Medicine and Dentistry 11 17%
Sports and Recreations 6 9%
Neuroscience 4 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 5%
Other 9 14%
Unknown 18 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 March 2005.
All research outputs
#7,524,294
of 22,962,258 outputs
Outputs from Osteoporosis International
#1,381
of 3,668 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#6,612
of 22,729 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Osteoporosis International
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,962,258 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,668 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.6. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 22,729 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them