↓ Skip to main content

Charakterisierung des schwer verletzten Fahrradfahrers

Overview of attention for article published in Die Unfallchirurgie, June 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • One of the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#3 of 820)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (95th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (99th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
4 news outlets
twitter
7 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
3 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
4 Mendeley
Title
Charakterisierung des schwer verletzten Fahrradfahrers
Published in
Die Unfallchirurgie, June 2016
DOI 10.1007/s00113-016-0208-y
Pubmed ID
Authors

T. Helfen, R. Lefering, M. Moritz, W. Böcker, S. Grote, Traumaregister DGU

Abstract

Transport statistics classify bicyclists in a separate road user collective. For medical reasons, this differentiation is applied as well. Much literature is published in this field. Nevertheless there is a lack of literature regarding the overall injury patterns in a defined injury severity collective. Most literature is about isolated injured regions in combination with a heterogeneous injury severity. Further parameters, such as injury patterns, epidemiological aspects, treatment focal points and characteristic outcomes, have also been studied. The aim of the present study was to evaluate and characterize injury patterns in a standardized and representative collective of severely injured bicyclists. Methods We analysed data from the Traumaregister DGU® from 2002 to 2010. In total, 2817 severely injured (ISS ≥ 9 and additional intensive/intermediate care unit) bicyclists were included. The primary endpoint was evaluation of injury patterns and injury focal points. In addition to that we analysed parameters like epidemiological aspects, circumstances of accident, treatment focal points and outcome. The mean age was 50.3 ± 20.9 years. Males accounted for 68.9 % (n = 1940). The mean ISS was 23.7 ± 12.6. The mean AIS regions were the head 71.9 % (n = 2025), the chest with 44.9 % (n = 1264) and the upper extremities 33.6 % (947). In 68.2 % of all cases an ISS ≥ 9 was achieved by a traumatic brain injury; 21.1 % of all cases were mono-injuries. A characteristic distribution of age and a characteristic prevalence of the accidents in relation to the weekday and the month could be shown. The present study analysed the largest ever published collective of severely injured bicyclists. Traumatic brain injury could clearly be shown as the main injury in this collective. Moreover, one of five cases achieved the state "severely injured" due to mono-injury.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 4 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 4 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Doctoral Student 2 50%
Student > Postgraduate 1 25%
Researcher 1 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 3 75%
Unknown 1 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 44. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 May 2020.
All research outputs
#937,960
of 25,478,886 outputs
Outputs from Die Unfallchirurgie
#3
of 820 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#17,785
of 367,458 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Die Unfallchirurgie
#1
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,478,886 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 820 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 1.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 367,458 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them