↓ Skip to main content

Circulation and water masses in the Faroese Channels during overflow '73

Overview of attention for article published in Ocean Dynamics, March 1981
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
122 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
15 Mendeley
Title
Circulation and water masses in the Faroese Channels during overflow '73
Published in
Ocean Dynamics, March 1981
DOI 10.1007/bf02226585
Authors

Harry D. Dooley, Jens Meincke

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 15 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 15 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 4 27%
Researcher 3 20%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 20%
Librarian 1 7%
Student > Bachelor 1 7%
Other 2 13%
Unknown 1 7%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Earth and Planetary Sciences 8 53%
Physics and Astronomy 2 13%
Arts and Humanities 1 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 7%
Environmental Science 1 7%
Other 2 13%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 October 2017.
All research outputs
#8,535,472
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Ocean Dynamics
#163
of 1,036 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,753
of 6,722 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Ocean Dynamics
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,036 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 1.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 6,722 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them