You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Prognostic or predictive value of MGMT promoter methylation in gliomas depends on IDH1 mutation
|
---|---|
Published in |
Neurology, September 2013
|
DOI | 10.1212/wnl.0b013e3182a95680 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Wolfgang Wick, Christoph Meisner, Bettina Hentschel, Michael Platten, Alissa Schilling, Benedikt Wiestler, Michael C. Sabel, Susanne Koeppen, Ralf Ketter, Markus Weiler, Ghazaleh Tabatabai, Andreas von Deimling, Dorothee Gramatzki, Manfred Westphal, Gabriele Schackert, Markus Loeffler, Matthias Simon, Guido Reifenberger, Michael Weller |
Abstract |
To explore whether the isocitrate dehydrogenase 1 (IDH1) or 1p/19q status determines the prognostic vs predictive role of O(6)-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase (MGMT) promoter methylation in the Neuro-Oncology Working Group of the German Cancer Society (NOA)-04 trial anaplastic glioma biomarker cohort. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 1 | 50% |
United States | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 50% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 154 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 2 | 1% |
France | 1 | <1% |
Germany | 1 | <1% |
Czechia | 1 | <1% |
South Africa | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 148 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 23 | 15% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 16 | 10% |
Researcher | 15 | 10% |
Other | 14 | 9% |
Student > Postgraduate | 12 | 8% |
Other | 36 | 23% |
Unknown | 38 | 25% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 63 | 41% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 12 | 8% |
Neuroscience | 8 | 5% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 6 | 4% |
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 3 | 2% |
Other | 11 | 7% |
Unknown | 51 | 33% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 December 2013.
All research outputs
#15,742,933
of 25,377,790 outputs
Outputs from Neurology
#15,277
of 21,010 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#121,104
of 215,521 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Neurology
#140
of 193 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,377,790 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 21,010 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 23.7. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 215,521 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 193 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.