↓ Skip to main content

An Initial Case Series of Intensive Cognitive–Behavioral Therapy for Obsessive–Compulsive Disorder in Adolescents with Autism Spectrum Disorder

Overview of attention for article published in Child Psychiatry & Human Development, April 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
40 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
134 Mendeley
Title
An Initial Case Series of Intensive Cognitive–Behavioral Therapy for Obsessive–Compulsive Disorder in Adolescents with Autism Spectrum Disorder
Published in
Child Psychiatry & Human Development, April 2017
DOI 10.1007/s10578-017-0724-1
Pubmed ID
Authors

Marina Iniesta-Sepúlveda, Joshua M. Nadeau, Amaya Ramos, Brian Kay, Bradley C. Riemann, Eric A. Storch

Abstract

Obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) is prevalent among youth with autism spectrum disorder (ASD). Cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT) with ASD-specific modifications has support for treating OCD in this population; however, use of intensive CBT in youth with ASD and severe OCD has not been tested. The current study examined the preliminary effectiveness of an individualized intensive CBT protocol for OCD in adolescents with ASD. Nine adolescents (aged 11-17 years) completed a regimen of intensive CBT (range 24-80 daily sessions) incorporating exposure with response prevention (ERP). Treatment materials, language and techniques were modified in accordance with evidence-based findings for this population. Seven of nine participants (78%) were treatment responders, and large treatment effects (d = 1.35-2.58) were obtained on primary outcomes (e.g., obsessive-compulsive symptom severity). Preliminary findings suggest that an intensive CBT approach for OCD is effective among adolescents with ASD.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 134 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 134 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 23 17%
Student > Bachelor 12 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 11 8%
Researcher 10 7%
Other 9 7%
Other 25 19%
Unknown 44 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 54 40%
Nursing and Health Professions 10 7%
Medicine and Dentistry 9 7%
Neuroscience 4 3%
Social Sciences 4 3%
Other 10 7%
Unknown 43 32%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 April 2017.
All research outputs
#17,885,520
of 22,962,258 outputs
Outputs from Child Psychiatry & Human Development
#679
of 920 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#221,208
of 309,929 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Child Psychiatry & Human Development
#9
of 17 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,962,258 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 920 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.9. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 309,929 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 17 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.