| Title |
Equity-focused knowledge translation: a framework for “reasonable action” on health inequities
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
International Journal of Public Health, October 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00038-013-0520-z |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
J. R. Masuda, T. Zupancic, E. Crighton, N. Muhajarine, E. Phipps |
| Abstract |
To identify gaps in procedural approaches to knowledge translation and outline a more relational approach that addresses health inequities based on creating collaborative environments for reasonable action. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 40 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Canada | 10 | 25% |
| United States | 8 | 20% |
| Australia | 4 | 10% |
| United Kingdom | 4 | 10% |
| Turkey | 2 | 5% |
| South Africa | 1 | 3% |
| Myanmar | 1 | 3% |
| Comoros | 1 | 3% |
| Brazil | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 8 | 20% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 23 | 57% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 10 | 25% |
| Scientists | 5 | 13% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 5% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 102 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Canada | 2 | 2% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 99 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 19 | 19% |
| Researcher | 12 | 12% |
| Student > Master | 12 | 12% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 8 | 8% |
| Professor | 7 | 7% |
| Other | 22 | 22% |
| Unknown | 22 | 22% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Social Sciences | 25 | 25% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 18 | 18% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 13 | 13% |
| Environmental Science | 3 | 3% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 12 | 12% |
| Unknown | 29 | 28% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 25. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 August 2016.
All research outputs
#1,536,895
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Public Health
#156
of 1,900 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#14,098
of 224,514 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Public Health
#2
of 17 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,900 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 224,514 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 17 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.