↓ Skip to main content

A Qualitative Study of Social Facilitators and Barriers to Health Behavior Change Among Persons with Serious Mental Illness

Overview of attention for article published in Community Mental Health Journal, September 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
48 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
107 Mendeley
Title
A Qualitative Study of Social Facilitators and Barriers to Health Behavior Change Among Persons with Serious Mental Illness
Published in
Community Mental Health Journal, September 2012
DOI 10.1007/s10597-012-9552-8
Pubmed ID
Authors

Kelly Aschbrenner, Elizabeth Carpenter-Song, Kim Mueser, Allison Kinney, Sarah Pratt, Stephen Bartels

Abstract

This qualitative focus group study was conducted to explore social facilitators and barriers to health behavior change in persons with serious mental illness engaged in a healthy lifestyle intervention. Six focus group interviews were conducted with a total of 30 clients stratified by "high" and "low" achievers in the program based on clinically significant weight loss or significant increase in fitness. Thematic analysis of focus group discussions revealed that emotional, practical, and mutual support from family members and significant others were social facilitators to health behavior change, while unhealthy social environments was a barrier. Participants in the "high" achiever group reported more mutual support for health behavior change than participants in the "low" achiever group. Results highlight the need for researchers and clinicians to consider the potential role of family and significant others as health supporters for persons with mental illness who could encourage healthy behavior in the social environment.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 107 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 2%
Chile 1 <1%
Unknown 104 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 20 19%
Student > Master 19 18%
Researcher 13 12%
Student > Bachelor 11 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 6%
Other 13 12%
Unknown 25 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 20 19%
Psychology 18 17%
Medicine and Dentistry 14 13%
Nursing and Health Professions 12 11%
Sports and Recreations 3 3%
Other 5 5%
Unknown 35 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 October 2013.
All research outputs
#15,283,138
of 22,727,570 outputs
Outputs from Community Mental Health Journal
#818
of 1,279 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#108,188
of 172,101 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Community Mental Health Journal
#6
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,727,570 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,279 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.8. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 172,101 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 4 of them.