↓ Skip to main content

Targeted screening for Coeliac Disease among irritable bowel syndrome patients: analysis of cost-effectiveness and value of information

Overview of attention for article published in HEPAC Health Economics in Prevention and Care, November 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (72nd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (93rd percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
15 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
51 Mendeley
Title
Targeted screening for Coeliac Disease among irritable bowel syndrome patients: analysis of cost-effectiveness and value of information
Published in
HEPAC Health Economics in Prevention and Care, November 2012
DOI 10.1007/s10198-012-0441-4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Leyla Mohseninejad, Talitha Feenstra, Henriëtte E. van der Horst, Hèlen Woutersen-Koch, Erik Buskens

Abstract

A high prevalence of Coeliac Disease (CD) is found among patients with a clinical diagnosis of irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) compared to the general population. Symptoms of CD are quite similar to IBS, but its treatment is different. The aim of this study was to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of screening for CD in patients with diarrhoea/mixed type IBS (IBS-D/mix) in terms of cost per quality adjusted life year (QALY) in the Netherlands.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 51 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 2%
Unknown 50 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 12 24%
Student > Master 10 20%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 8%
Student > Bachelor 3 6%
Other 3 6%
Other 7 14%
Unknown 12 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 16 31%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 9 18%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 4%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 4%
Other 6 12%
Unknown 13 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 August 2015.
All research outputs
#7,778,510
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from HEPAC Health Economics in Prevention and Care
#513
of 1,303 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#76,085
of 285,526 outputs
Outputs of similar age from HEPAC Health Economics in Prevention and Care
#1
of 16 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,303 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 285,526 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 16 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.