| Title |
Charcoal production through selective logging leads to degradation of dry woodlands: a case study from Mutomo District, Kenya
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Arid Land, April 2016
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s40333-016-0124-6 |
| Authors |
Geoffrey M. Ndegwa, Udo Nehren, Friederike Grüninger, Miyuki Iiyama, Dieter Anhuf |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 80 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 80 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 15 | 19% |
| Student > Master | 13 | 16% |
| Researcher | 12 | 15% |
| Student > Bachelor | 5 | 6% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 4 | 5% |
| Other | 12 | 15% |
| Unknown | 19 | 24% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Environmental Science | 26 | 33% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 13 | 16% |
| Energy | 4 | 5% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 2 | 3% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 10 | 13% |
| Unknown | 23 | 29% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 October 2018.
All research outputs
#4,740,510
of 22,962,258 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Arid Land
#6
of 64 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#74,096
of 298,803 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Arid Land
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,962,258 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 76th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 64 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 298,803 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them