↓ Skip to main content

Nutrient use efficiency and biomass production of tree species for rotational woodlot systems in semi-arid Morogoro, Tanzania

Overview of attention for article published in Agroforestry Systems, April 2007
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
42 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
82 Mendeley
Title
Nutrient use efficiency and biomass production of tree species for rotational woodlot systems in semi-arid Morogoro, Tanzania
Published in
Agroforestry Systems, April 2007
DOI 10.1007/s10457-007-9061-x
Authors

Anthony A. Kimaro, Vic R. Timmer, Ancelm G. Mugasha, Shaban A. O. Chamshama, Deborah A. Kimaro

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 82 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 2%
Japan 1 1%
India 1 1%
Kenya 1 1%
Unknown 77 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 22 27%
Student > Master 18 22%
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 11%
Student > Bachelor 7 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 6%
Other 10 12%
Unknown 11 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 28 34%
Environmental Science 26 32%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 4 5%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 3 4%
Unspecified 1 1%
Other 3 4%
Unknown 17 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 January 2017.
All research outputs
#7,524,294
of 22,962,258 outputs
Outputs from Agroforestry Systems
#241
of 979 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#27,146
of 76,652 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Agroforestry Systems
#1
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,962,258 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 979 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.1. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 76,652 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them