↓ Skip to main content

Classifications in Brief: Hamada Classification of Massive Rotator Cuff Tears

Overview of attention for article published in Clinical Orthopaedics & Related Research, April 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (73rd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (65th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
9 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
38 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
98 Mendeley
Title
Classifications in Brief: Hamada Classification of Massive Rotator Cuff Tears
Published in
Clinical Orthopaedics & Related Research, April 2017
DOI 10.1007/s11999-017-5340-7
Pubmed ID
Authors

Tyler J. Brolin, Gary F. Updegrove, John G. Horneff

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 98 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 98 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Postgraduate 15 15%
Student > Doctoral Student 13 13%
Student > Master 9 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 8%
Other 7 7%
Other 21 21%
Unknown 25 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 50 51%
Nursing and Health Professions 11 11%
Engineering 5 5%
Sports and Recreations 3 3%
Computer Science 1 1%
Other 2 2%
Unknown 26 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 February 2022.
All research outputs
#5,207,253
of 25,382,440 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Orthopaedics & Related Research
#1,314
of 7,300 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#85,634
of 323,891 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Orthopaedics & Related Research
#27
of 82 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,382,440 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,300 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 323,891 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 82 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.